Does this litigation or controversy involve important and novel questions of law, the favorable decision of which could provide a substantial benefit for a significant number of Georgia municipalities?
Is the full and vigorous litigating of such questions of law hampered by the limited resources of the requesting municipality or the extraordinary cost to the requesting municipality?
Does the case have important statewide implications for Georgia municipalities?
Do all or most Georgia cities have a common interest in the same outcome on the issues to be addressed in the amicus brief?
Would the decision in this case serve as persuasive precedent in similar future controversies for Georgia cities?
What is the likelihood that GMA’s participation would have a positive effect on the outcome of the case?
Does the case address a central municipal value or is it less directly related to common interests of municipal governments in Georgia?
Is there a reasonable likelihood of success?
Do the facts and preceding litigation provide a likelihood of success?
Is there sufficient time to prepare a quality brief?